<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Smiley's Blog - Latest Comments in Would you pay for IT Freedom in the workplace?</title><link>http://edsmiley.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://edsmiley.disqus.com/would_you_pay_for_it_freedom_in_the_workplace/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:15:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Would you pay for IT Freedom in the workplace?</title><link>http://edsmiley.com/?p=352#comment-23867843</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I do not agree with Greg. The fact that Firefox is one of the best browsers, which now can be found. Yes, there may be some gaps, but 100% security of Firefox is much higher than IE.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P.S. Excellent &lt;a href="http://www.research-service.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.research-service.com"&gt;paper writing service&lt;/a&gt; is here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paperwritingservice</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:15:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Would you pay for IT Freedom in the workplace?</title><link>http://edsmiley.com/?p=352#comment-17157633</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I personally like Firefox but it seems to have as many or more security holes and is updated more often than Internet Explorer nowadays.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From an IT perspective managing thousands of computers, Firefox requires additional time and manpower to update since users should not have administrative rights on their computers, which is necessary for Firefox, and updates should be managed centrally.  IE updates automatically via Windows Updates\WSUS.   &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:20:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>